Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madelief Hageman vs Annika Barth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hageman vs Barth analysis and find out who is favored!
Madelief Hageman vs Annika Barth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hageman 3 - 0 Barth
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hageman has won 48.31% of points on their second serve, while Barth has won 33.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hageman, in recent form, has won 56.98% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barth has won 49.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.19% and 39.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hageman has saved 48.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barth has saved 52.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hageman has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/ 33), with Barth winning 43.75% (W/L 7/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 89/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Barth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 30/ 27), where as Barth has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 7/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Hageman winning 3 times and Barth being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Hageman winning 6 and Barth winning 1. The last match between Hageman and Barth was at the W15 Eindhoven, 30-07-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Madelief Hageman getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hageman and Barth have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hageman winning 1 times and Barth 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hageman winning 0, and Barth 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hageman has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.7 while Barth has played against players with an average rank of 54.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hageman has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barth has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hageman has converted 45.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barth has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
51% (93-89)
Career Total W/L
49% (19-20)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Annika Barth |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 42 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:20 | 0:57:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (58/100) | 54% (66/122) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (38/58) | 61% (40/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (22/42) | 30% (17/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (11/24) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (65/122) | 40% (40/100) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Madelief Hageman
Player
Annika Barth
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 2-6 10-8 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Annika Barth
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madelief Hageman | Annika Barth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 56% (5/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (43/31) | 55% (11/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (367/311) | 51% (90/88) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 133.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1080/1691) | 66% (123/186) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (619/1080) | 62% (76/123) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (303/611) | 33% (21/63) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (103/224) | 43% (10/23) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (805/1716) | 43% (74/171) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (18/11) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 25% (4/1) |
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Suana Tucakovic
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
99)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
51 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Mana Kawamura
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
82%
(
27 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-0 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Madelief Hageman
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Dimitra Pavlou
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
48 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ioana Zvonaru
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Draginja Vukovic
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Madelief Hageman
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Stefania Bojica
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
58%
(
42 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
75
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 7-6(4) 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Annika Barth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
Player
Annika Barth
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Annika Barth
Player
Elizaveta Gurianova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Annika Barth
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-7(5) 6-1 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Annika Barth
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hageman Vs Barth Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
